Budget Takes a Beating
Chancellor Bill Snyder says UT Knoxville can use its budget problems to
become a stronger institution.
Needs and commitments for the 1997 fiscal year were approximately $7 million
higher than projected revenues, forcing campus officials to cut the budget,
leave faculty positions vacant, and lay off administrative and support staff.
"As painful as the financial environment will be for the next two to
three years, the exercise of fiscal self-discipline to a degree never practiced
before can provide an opportunity for emerging as a stronger university,"
Snyder said at a convocation on the University's financial future.
"We can become stronger by doing fewer things but doing them better."
Budget woes stemmed from a change in the way the state funds higher education,
a state requirement that the University fund one percent of a three percent
employee pay increase, a decline in graduate school enrollment, increases
in fixed costs, and funding of campus priorities such as scholarships.
The campus trimmed overall spending about 5 percent, with cuts in academic
departments averaging about 4. 2 percent, Snyder said. In making the cuts,
officials tried to lessen the impact on students; preserve or strengthen
teaching, research, and service; and preserve institutional values, such
as the commitment to diversity.
UT Knoxville's educational and general budget for FY 97 is about $242 million.
The campus' state appropriation makes up $147 million of that total, with
an additional $76 million coming from student fees.
Officials expect a couple more difficult years because funding formula changes
will take time, indirect cost recoveries for doing research may decline,
and graduate enrollment probably won't grow dramatically.
Snyder said there is hope for the long term in Gov. Don Sundquist's statement
that he would like to begin a multi-year program of improvements for higher
education similar to the one in place for K-12.
For this to happen, Snyder said, "We will have to demonstrate that
we have seriously addressed the challenges of establishing priorities, placing
our resources in areas of highest priority, and reducing or eliminating
areas of lesser priority."
Return to Summer 1996 table of contents.
|